About Me

Name: AA Bruzzone
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Reagan Left Long Ago--Conservative Crackup 2007


SAN FRANCISCO, Ca --   The eerie replication of the seventies continues. With one exception. In 1976, President Nixon took his "silent majority" and the Republican party into a dark winter.  But a movement, optimistic and hopeful, and a charismatic leader, proven and confident, percolated in the wings.  Flash forward to 2007, as the conservative coalition collapses and engages in sectarian verbal violence, there is no fresh, self-confident leader being groomed in the wings. No promising large-state governor, articulate, tenacious, and cemented to principle.

Instead, the party's leadership has been transferred, de facto, to moderate pragmatic leaders, each flawed, and each a blend of left and right leanings. In other words, they're just a step away from conservative Democrats.

In a previous column ("After The Republican Fall", October 2006), I envisioned what would occur following a major defeat in the November 2006 elections. 

The conservative movement and the Republican Party could have bunkered down, cleaned up the wreck, and prepared for the next wave.   There was the another possibility I didn't discuss; the actual outcome.  The factions of the fragile conservative coalition --- like Sunnis, and Shiites, and the rest of the cast blowing themselves up in Iraq --  have turned their minds, passions and pens on each other.

They're inflicting serious damage.  The wreck was caused by the likes of Christian Coalition 'leader' Ralph Reed (taking six-figure checks from high-flying lobbyist Jack Abramoff to run a phony campaign to help an indian tribe), greedy fiscal conservatives (feasting on earmarks and busting the federal budget driving discretionary spending up 35.8 percent), the myopic neo-conservatives like Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Pearle (and their holy wars everywhere, all the time), and finally the inexperience of President Bush as a wartime president.  It  means the Republican Winter will be much longer than I expected. Meanwhile, the conservative crackup is in full force.

Thirty years ago, President Nixon left the party in shambles. Democrat Jimmy Carter beat President Gerald Ford.  But during that presidential campaign, Ronald Reagan entered the scene.  There wasn't a convention delegate in Kansas City's Kemper Arena in 1976 who doubted that Ronald Reagan would be back.  The limp presidency of Carter set up the sequel to the '76 campaign. 

The conservative coalition coalesced. They held hands, buried their intellectual hatchets:  Fiscal conservatives, libertarians, moral conservatives, Christian conservatives, strong defense advocates, anti-tax advocates, journalists, speakers and the rank and file found a leader. Four years later, Ronald Reagan was president. 

Thirty years later, the Republican Party had the reigns and lost it.  We controlled Congress and presidency.  The failure is solely ours. The Democrats, divided and intellectually bankrupt, can share no blame for Congress' performance or current U.S. foreign policy.  It will get worse. 

In 2008, Republicans must defend 21 out of 33 contested Senate seats.  Colorado Senator Wayne Allard won't be running.  Other possible retirees include Ted Stevens of Alaska (taking with him his bridge to no where), Senator John Warner of Virginia, and Pete Domenici of New Mexico.  Other vulnerable GOP senators include Gordon Smith of Oregon, Norm Coleman of Minnesota, and John Sununu of New Hampshire. 

Once the primaries are over, Democrats will have fire in their belly.  Victory at all cost, whomever the nominee.  So, we have the prospect of a Democrat-controlled Congress and presidency. It couldn't come at worse time.  The country has an impending rendezvous with trillion dollar Medicare and Social Security deficits.  All the elements for the biggest expansion of the federal government and taxes in U.S. history. The Democrats are masters of big government and higher taxes.

American politics is dominated not by ideas.  In American politics, great ideas are embodied in a charismatic leader.  The two-party system guarantees that a winning party is in the end no party at all; instead a united coalition.  Only a strong leader can unite a coalition.  That's what makes the conservative winter something to be feared.  Until a proven winner emerges who understands and can connect with all the factions of the conservative movement and the Republican party, the American voters will be in no mood to hear the themes of the last 25 years.  There is no one on the horizon.  Reagan left long ago.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Finally, a Wartime President

SAN FRANCISCO, Ca --- Tonight, President Bush became a bonafide 'wartime president'.  The key skill of a wartime president is to uplift the American spririt with carefully limited military facts and mission, while preventing the enemy from knowing our strategy.

For the first time, he spoke like the commander-in-chief, and not as a politician.  Hidden between the lines is a threat to both Iraq and Iran.  Iraq, this is your last opportunity.  Iran, just like we targeted our enemy in Somalia 48 hours ago, we will target you if you continue to aid the insurgents.

For the first time, he showed he understood the conflict from a military viewpoint.  Whether you disagree with the 'surge', he has his vision of the concluding this conflict.  My opinion:  He's using the Nixon strategy.  In 1973, Nixon resumed the bombing of North Vietnam, massive bombing, unrelentless almost 24 hours per day.  It was a prelude to negotiations.  Bush's "surge" I believe is the same strategy.

There will be movement in the next several months.  Positive, I believe

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Choosing a Wartime President



SAN FRANCISCO, Ca --- Not even the most ardent supporters of President George W. Bush would claim he was elected to be a wartime president.  G.W. Bush campaigned as a domestic president, intent to lower taxes, improve education and bring compassion to conservative politics.  He hoped, and he expected, to deal with the economy, taxes, education, medicare and social security reform.

In two years, for the 2008 presidential race, that will not be the case.  The country will be seeking a wartime president.

The honeymoon following the defeat of the Soviet Union lasted just ten years.  President Bush believed he would be able to concentrate on domestic issues, like his predecessor. 

But Bush, along with the nation, was been thrust into a new war. The new enemy is ruthless, stateless, and effective --- they attacked the homeland. So, the voters in 2008 will be choosing a wartime president.

What then makes an effective wartime president, and how does the current field of candidates measure up.

First and foremost, a wartime president is Commander-in-Chief.  The people expect a wartime president to understand the principles of military strategy and principles.  More important, they also expect he or she will successfully protect the country.  They want a president that doesn't  just listen to the Joint Chiefs of Staff; but in a real sense leads the armed forces. From George Washington through Ronald Reagan (who indeed campaigned as a wartime president), each had the intellectual tenacity and moral will to lead the nation's military to victory.  But they also understood the battlefield reports, and stuck to a strategy for victory.

Winner:  John McCain.  McCain is the only candidate who has a proven military record, who comes from a military family, and without effort speaks intelligently and coherently in military terms.

Second, a wartime president must communicate with the people. He, or she, must be able to report on the ups and downs of the battlefield. The Civil War was a grueling and bloody ordeal. For years, the U.S. Civil War war was an effective stalemate, with each side posting significant victories, followed by setbacks.  A wartime president must be able to sustain the country's will to persist. 

A wartime president must also be able to intimidate the enemy and express a unwavering and reasoned belief in ultimate victory.  In the current situation, with a media blanket to report on specific battles and incidents, a wartime president faces challenges unimaginable just forty years ago.  The media itself becomes a battlefield to be won or lost.

Winner:  Rudy Giuliani.  By his behavior as Mayor of New York he showed natural skills to calm the city and nation, display guarded optimism in the future, and performed most effectively before the scrutiny of the media.

Third a wartime president must exude rugged determination.  War is by nature exhausting and trying, for the individual soldier, and for the nation.  The people expect their president to be a model of determination. They expect a fact-grounded unflappability. 

Winners:  Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, and John McCain.  Clinton in her demeanor (which also poses a negative) shows toughness and seriousness.   The nation cannot forget her poise throughout her husband's marital difficulties.  Giuliani distinguished himself as both a battle-harden prosecutor of organized crime and as the mayor of the city attacked during 9-1-1.   McCain proved his inner fortitude as a prisoner of war and combat pilot.

There are certainly other qualities that make a successful wartime president.  But these are essential. 

Recent polls show that the American people are consciously or unconsciously eyeing the expected potential 2008 presidential candidates within the backdrop of our on terrorists/radical Muslims.  Both Rudy Giuliani and John McCain would probably beat Hillary Clinton by seven to nine points if the election were held today.   (FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. May 16-18, 2006)

But much will transpire over the next two years.  The ultimate victor will be tested through tough televised debates, convention speeches, and the dynamics of the primaries.  Campaign 2008 will itself be a battle in which each candidate will demonstrate why he or she will be able to be a successful wartime president.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »